The Capital: “Annapolis accepts part of Crystal Spring application”

By: Chase Cook, Capital Gazette reporter The city has accepted Crystal Spring’s Forest Stand Delineation, which sets the stage for developers to again initiate the formal application process for the project. However, developers aren’t sure when they might submit a new plan after recent actions by the City Council. The Department of Neighborhood and Environmental read on >

Developers Attempt to Renege on Conservation Pledges

In February, the Crystal Spring developers filed a new Forest Stand Delineation (FSD) with the City to greatly expand the area that could be considered for development by including an additional 76 acres of Mas Que Farm beyond the original 111 acres at Crystal Spring. The FSD must be approved before the development can move read on >

Capital LTE: “‘Tweaking’ Crystal Spring is Not Enough”

Regarding the story headlined “Crystal Spring developers to tweak proposed site boundaries” (The Capital, March 3): Tweaked? Crystal Spring boundaries to be tweaked? Why is it so difficult to understand that we don’t want Crystal Spring tweaked? We want what the mayor said he wanted: that there would be no Crystal Spring development. The arrogance, read on >

Developers Ask City to Expand Area for Potential Development Beyond Crystal Spring

Recently, the Crystal Spring developers filed a new Forest Stand Delineation (FSD) with the City to greatly expand the area that could be considered for development to include an additional 76 acres of Mas Que Farm. This is beyond the original 111 acres at Crystal Spring. The FSD must be approved before the development can read on >

The Capital: “Crystal Spring developers to tweak proposed site boundaries”

By: Chase Cook, Capital Gazette reporter Newly submitted documents for the proposed Crystal Spring development have concerned environmentalists in Annapolis, as it appears the developer is expanding into land that was originally targeted for conservation. Developers and city officials say that isn’t the case, and that the amended Forest Stand Delineation report is merely a read on >