Be Part of the Conversation
A threshold issue for citizens concerned about development of Crystal Spring is the prospect for future additional development on the property. They want assurance that if the Providence Point senior community project is ever approved, all other future development will be extinguished. A binding legal document must be agreed upon ensuring the land will be read on >
Blog
Crystal Spring Development Plans Grossly Fail to Meet Stormwater Pollution Laws
The control of polluted stormwater from the Crystal Spring development continues to be a major concern surrounding the proposed destruction of 30-acres of mature forest on a 35-acre footprint. The development site for the senior community now called The Village at Providence Point flows directly into Crab Creek, which is already one of the two read on >
Ensuring No Net Loss of Forest at Crystal Spring
Since the inception of plans for the development of Crystal Spring, the destruction of 30-40 acres of mature, protected forest has been a pivotal issue of concern to residents of the area. National Lutheran Communities and Services (NLCS) filed plans with the City of Annapolis on January 22, 2019 to build 303 senior homes and read on >
County Executive Reneges on Campaign Promise to Stop Forest Destruction
Questions have been raised about County Executive Pittman’s just introduced ordinance regarding forest conservation. This legislation is a disappointment as it falls way short of stopping the loss of forest in the county from development. Please don’t be fooled by this plan and the hype associated with it. While it will not affect Crystal Spring read on >
Capital Op-Ed: “Steuart Pittman’s half measure won’t stop Anne Arundel forest loss”
By: Gerald Winegrad County Executive Steuart Pittman proposed legislation this week to deal with the staggering loss of forest in Anne Arundel County. His administration has discovered that the pro-development posture of county officials over the years, propped up by huge campaign contributions by developers has led to a significant loss of forest cover — read on >
Traffic Improvements Still Needed for Crystal Spring Development
As we wait for the City Planning and Zoning Department (P&Z) to finish its review of the January 22 filings for the Providence Point development at Crystal Spring, we continue to emphasize our four core issues of concern that have yet to be fully addressed. These include: Extending the parallel road through the development to read on >
Capital LTE: “Getting it right on Providence Point”
Larry Bradshaw’s letter defending his development plans for Crystal Spring distorts the harsh reality: Plans submitted for this 351-unit project failed to meet basic environmental requirements under city laws (The Capital, Aug. 7). The January filings came months after the city enacted requirements for 100% reforestation of the 30-acres of mature forest they plan to read on >
Capital LTE: “Providence Point’s pledges mean nothing”
The headline about the development of Crystal Spring (aka the Village at Providence Point) incorrectly summarized the serious shortcomings of the latest plans (The Capital, July 26). City planners did not direct “more trees” as the headline asserts. Rather, the developers were directed to destroy less forest that the 30 acres planned. And, the city read on >
The Capital: “Annapolis Planners to Providence Point: More Trees”
By: Naomi Harris, Capital Gazette reporter Annapolis city planners have sent back initial plans for a proposed senior living development on Forest Drive with 50 requests for changes or revisions, the first response to the plan since it was submitted earlier this year. The five pages of notes on the Village at Providence Point focus read on >
Capital LTE: “Providence Point is marketing too early”
Kathleen Reavley asked: 1) why she is receiving invitations to sales meetings for units at Providence Point, and 2) wonders if the destructive plans have been approved (The Capital, July 4). Plans submitted to the City on Jan. 22, have not been approved, nor are they anywhere near approval. The developers refused to modify their read on >